Essentials of psychiatric diagnosis: Responding to the challenge of DSM-5. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21, 262–268.įrances, A. Empirical grounding versus innovation in the DSM-5 revision process: Implications for the future.
Current Opinions in Psychiatry, 24, 1–9.įirst, M.
DSM-5 proposals for mood disorders: A cost-benefit analysis. Psychological Injury and Law, 3, 255–259.įirst, M. The PTSD stressor criterion as a barrier to malingering: DSM-5 draft commentaries. Industry’s colonization of psychiatry: Ethical and practical implications of financial conflicts of interest in the DSM-5. A comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 panel member’s financial associations with industry: A pernicious problem persists. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 43–58.Ĭosgrove, L., & Krimsky, S. DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part I: Study design, sampling strategy, implementation, and analytic approaches. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40, 531–536.Ĭlarke, D. Psychiatry’s new manual (DSM-5): Ethical and conceptual dimensions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 25–51.īlumenthal-Barby, J. The cycle of classification: DSM-I through DSM-5. The DSM-5: Hyperbole, hope, or hypothesis? BioMed Central Medicine, 11, 128. Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 42, 136–140.īechtel, W., & Richardson, R. Commentary: DSM-5 and forensic psychiatry. Highlights of changes from DSM-IV-TR-DSM-5. Washington, DC: Author.Īmerican Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR (4th ed., text rev.). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Īmerican Psychiatric Association. Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Īchenbach, T. Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR, and TRF profiles. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īchenbach, T. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. To conclude, I note that using the DSM-5 might induce in the users the humorously entitled DSM-5 Confusion Disorder. I underscore the need to adopt the biopsychosocial approach in psychiatry, generally, and for revising the DSM-5, specifically. My contributions to the field in this chapter include developing a better definition of mental disorder. Finally, I compared the draft and final version, and found that any mention of the term biopsychosocial was removed. Also, the field trials for the DSM-5 used a draft version that was changed for the final version. In addition, often it sets a bar too low, and exposes both vulnerable people and normal ones to the risks of overdiagnosis and of pathologizing normal conditions.įurther, apparently the DSM-5 workgroups were compromised ethically. The critique of the DSM-5 has focused on deficits in its utility, reliability, and validity. Then, it gives the major specific changes incorporated in the DSM-5. It examines etiology and also the biopsychosocial model. The first chapter of the four in this series begins with an overview of the DSM-5 and the assumptions that are needed to revise it. It gives voice to critics of the DSM-5, and ends with recommendations.
Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013), in general, and particular DSM categories, especially PTSD. The next four chapters of the present work review the DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder.